Why is dictatorship good

Instead of people finding fault with what government fails in, the press and government propaganda constantly drive into their ears what government is doing for the people. In the end will this not produce more peace of mind and happiness than our democratic way of emphasizing fault-finding. On the topic of promoting public happiness, Heiser drew a similar conclusion during his visit to Germany on June 3, And yet one begins to wonder whether there is not much to be said in favor of the good type of dictatorships, in promoting human happiness.

In democracies people are [annoyed] to say or think little of the good things government does for them and to place main emphasis upon petty fault finding. One year prior to the outbreak of World War II, Heiser penned perhaps his most generous account of dictatorships. I provide it below in full:. They have many surface advantages and it is hard to see how democracies are eventually going to be able to compete with them.

It is as carried out in Italy and Germany at present the rule of the efficient as compared with a compromise with ignorance.

Why should the ignorant have a [vice] about things they do not understand? Think of thousands of people voting for Franklin Roosevelt under the impression they were voting for Theodore. Or millions voting on free silver a gold without having the slightest comprehension of the significance. Think of the thousands of unnecessary units of administration just because a few clever politicians know how to play on ignorant minds to keep themselves in useless offices.

No strikes in dictatorships. They set their goals in which they have to progress and develop. The absence of other concerns helps them to achieve their goal easily. They set the rules and regulations which they think are suitable. No one amongst the citizens dares to object them. Because there is no consultation or debates taking place over any issue, hence quick actions can be taken. This makes a dictator country always stay ahead of rival nations. Intern With Us.

It has fewer advantages than disadvantages Advantages Low crime rates. Rapid progression The dictators have access and control over everything right from the economy to the laws and the people. Efficient administration They set the rules and regulations which they think are suitable. We get a stable government. They prove very crucial during the times of emergency. It is surprisingly common for dictators to authorize the mass killings of innocent people as a way for them to stay in charge.

This process is one of the easiest and fastest ways to consolidate power in this government structure.

Some even issue orders as a direct response to opposition activities. That is why the majority of a population flees a country in this structure because millions can die if they decide to stay at home. Dictatorships can struggle to maintain control with the removal of a leader.

On the odd chance that a dictator decides to relinquish their power voluntarily, the power vacuum this situation would create could be enough to destroy the government entirely. This outcome is possible even if the leader passes away without a succession plan in place. Even the perception of a problem can be enough to create unrest throughout society until someone can step into the vacant role. Because of this disadvantage, it is not unusual for dictators or groups to designate a line of succession that is based on their own self-interest.

When Kim Jon-un had his half-brother murdered in Malaysia, this action was representative of this potential disadvantage. It is a system of government that typically reduces productivity. Although a dictatorship does create an opportunity for increased productivity levels through the implementation of fear, the focus of the general population is to stay in compliance with the ever-changing laws that filter through.

It is not unusual for the average person to become indifferent to their government because their focus remains on getting through the day. We can see this disadvantage playing out in North Korea right now. If you have wealth in the country, then you can get your hands on almost anything you want. When you are just an average person in the general population, then finding food or having heat for your home are not guaranteed. That means your worries are more about your daily needs than any political choices there might be.

Personal rights are severely restricted in dictatorships. There are several common restrictions that you will find present in this form of government. Most of them involve a right to speak your mind, practice the religion that you want, or access information that does not include propaganda. The goal of these restrictions is to keep the general population suppressed to ensure that the dictator can remain in power for however long they wish to stay there.

It may provide short-term results because of the fear of reprisal, but it can also become the first step toward the nation failing since people will eventually resist if the screws against them get turned deep enough. Dictators rule through fear more than they do through successful political processes. The theory of dictatorship does allow for societal benefits if the best interests of the general population are at the heart of each action taken by the leader or group.

Reality suggests that most dictators think more about their political ambitions and global power more than they do about a family having enough to eat at night. During the 20th century, only three dictators Zedong, Hitler, Stalin were responsible for the deaths of over million people. Their actions to cause these outcomes were a method of staying in power because it told the average person that if they stepped out of line, then they could suffer a similar fate. This form of government isolates the leadership and nation from the rest of the world.

Dictatorships are not well-accepted by the rest of the world. You will find that the allies of most dictators tend to be other countries who have a similar form of government. Communist governments also tend to support this structure whenever they can. The economic crisis in Venezuela is a prime example of this issue. It was a country that was once rich, but it is now suffering from rampant inflation. Oil revenues have crashed at the same time, which means the 1.

It costs more today to purchase a banana there than it did to buy a house just a decade ago. By the end of , prices were doubling every 19 days. The people have no control over the leadership of their country. Elections are sometimes held with this form of government, such as in Russia or Venezuela, but the authenticity of the vote almost always comes into question. When a dictator is in charge of the government, the people have no say in how their future governing experience will be.

Even if these actions are benevolent, there is much less control for society to have a say in what happens. Many dictatorships are run through the military. It is not unusual for the military of a nation to decide that they want to take over the government. Once this coup occurs, then the leading general is typically appointed as the ruling leader.

This person remains in charge until they decide to retire, leave, or die, which then places the responsibility on the next person in the chain-of command.